编辑发来的审稿人意见
编辑发来的审稿人意见 背景情况:大多数文章都是这个命运,越牛的杂志越容易被枪毙,一般杂志都要全票通过,下面例子里面3个裁判,一个裁判A要求主要变动,这个一般就是要你再做一大半,很难满足,当然你也可以考虑按他说的改,但是你改后未必能被让他满意并接收;裁判B没意见;裁判C小改动;投稿很讲运气;碰到怎样的裁判结果都可能不同;最后我已经改版投一个相对低一点的杂志Dear Dr. XXXX: Manuscript no.: XXXXXXX Title: "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" Enclosed are the reviews for your manuscript. In view of the reviewer recommendations and my own examination of the manuscript, I regret that I cannot accept your manuscript for publication in The Journal of Organic Chemistry. The manuscript is not acceptable in its current form because Referee A raises significant concerns. Please feel free to resubmit the manuscript to JOC in the future once the concerns are addressed. Referee A's comments: Please indicate whether the manuscript meets each of the following criteria: Are significant new results reported? No If portions of the work have been previously reported, does the present manuscript represent a substantial extension of the work? No Is the manuscript likely to be of interest to a reasonable number of organic chemists? Yes Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data presented? Yes Are the compounds reported adequately characterized with regard to identity and purity? Yes Are the literature references appropriate and correct? Yes Is the manuscript written clearly and concisely in idiomatic English? Yes Rate the overall Importance of this paper to the field of Organic Chemistry |